5. Massimo Troisi in The Postman- This is an odd nomination, becuase this is simply just a terribly uninteresting lightweight performance that never really seems to do anything.
4. Anthony Hopkins in Nixon- Hopkins is all over the place with his over the top turn as Nixon. He frankly goes to far with his slimy portrayal, making Nixon a rather hard to believe character, which is a problem when the character is a real person.
3. Richard Dreyfuss in Mr. Holland Opus- Although I care not for the film I must admit that Dreyfuss does a fine job in a cliched role. He is properly passionate, and inspiring in his role, I really cannot fault him here.
2. Nicolas Cage in Leaving Las Vegas- Nicolas Cage leaves a memorable impression in his role as a slowly dying alcoholic. Cage is realistic in the technical aspects of his performance, and properly powerful in his more dramatic aspects.
1. Sean Penn in Dead Man Walking- Penn although does have the least screen time of any of these performances, leaves by far the deepest mark for me. Penn gives an extremely powerful performance, that is very hard to forget. Penn finds the right path throughout his performance, to show the facets of the convicted man, and to show him as a honest human being, making his eventual faith all the more powerful .
Deserving Performances:
Morgan Freeman in Seven
|
|
|
|---|
Showing posts with label Sean Penn. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sean Penn. Show all posts
Best Actor 1995: Sean Penn in Dead Man Walking
Sean Penn received his first Oscar nomination for portraying Matthew Poncelet in Dead Man Walking.
Dead Man Walking is a very effective film, a message film that work extremely well because as well as getting its points across smoothly, it also never pains the opposition as one dimensional as a lesser film would have.
Sean Penn is an actor that has not done particularly well in my reviews so far. What I usually do not like of his performances is a tendency to overact, as well as to give what seem to be overly calculated performances that spend far too much time on mannerisms that get in the way of any actual characterization. These problems perhaps developed overtime because they will not be found in this performance.
Sean Penn's performance this is still certianly a very specific character. He uses an accent, as well as distinct way he stands and looks that suggests the upbringing as well as the past of his character. The reason they work in this film is because Penn is consist with them, and never puts an overt emphasis, rather simply having them there as part of the actual person that is Matthew Poncelet.
The other reason these mannerisms work in the performance is because he brings them in with a full characterization of the person, that is never just an an external attitude, but a person as a whole. Penn performance as Matthew Poncelet most certainly is careful and finely attuned but it still always remains natural, and his acting never becomes obvious as it does in some of his later performances.
Sean Penn's performance is quite interesting in how he shows the way Poncelet has almost developed himself into particular way from his life on death role. When the Sister Helen Prejean (Susan Sarandon) first comes to meet him, he attempts to act tougher than he really is. Penn is on the mark in creating a bit of a facade Matthew has, that he almost has to have, well still suggesting his actual more sensitive self.
I think something rather interesting that Penn does in this performance is the fact that he does not try to portray Poncelet as all that intelligent, but still not a simple man. Penn portrays his lack of intelligence actually in Poncelet's television interview where he makes several extreme remarks involving racism as well as terrorism.
Penn makes this seem as something Poncelet does not necessarily that he really at all believes it but rather he just again uses as some sort of attempt to show his anger over his condemnation. When questioned by the sister, Penn really shows just the complete lack of though Poncelet really has over the matter, Penn shows that Poncelet honestly is just not a smart man.
The most important part of his performance is of course Poncelet's whole relationship with the sister. Sarandon and Penn do wonders together, in creating the incredible unique relationship between the Nun and the death row inmate. It is fascinating because Sarandon portrays the sister always as warm, and loving, but still she pressures Matthew on his refusal to accept that he was at all guilty.
Penn though interestingly does not always show as much focus in the relationship until near the end, because Penn does a great job in showing that Matthew has a lot more on his mind all the time, and how his impending death, as well as his guilt is constantly eating away at him, making him more reluctant to try to always instantly accept the sister's method of try to save him.
Penn though eases in perfectly when they become more relaxed with one another, and begins to shed his facade of sorts, and really opens up to her, showing with Penn presenting Matthew's deep sadness and fear he deeply has inside himself. They eventually create a credible, very authentic relationship honestly based on very real platonic love for one another.
The most powerful moments of his performance are on his execution date. Every scene on his last day is made heartbreaking becuase through the entire ordeal Penn never strikes a single false note. From his last visit from his family, which is particularly effective because of how warm he is with his brother and his mother, as he tries to ignore the execution on his mind. To later nearer to it when he finally comes to grip completely with his situation and his guilt.
The final scenes are rather difficult to watch, because Penn really shows this being a human being killed, not some animal, but a man. A man with his honest fear of death, and finally his admittance of what he did. Penn never for a moment seems to be acting, he really becomes a man who is about to be killed, it is incredible as well as distressing to watch. This is simply a great performance by Penn that leaves an almost unforgettable impression.
Dead Man Walking is a very effective film, a message film that work extremely well because as well as getting its points across smoothly, it also never pains the opposition as one dimensional as a lesser film would have.
Sean Penn is an actor that has not done particularly well in my reviews so far. What I usually do not like of his performances is a tendency to overact, as well as to give what seem to be overly calculated performances that spend far too much time on mannerisms that get in the way of any actual characterization. These problems perhaps developed overtime because they will not be found in this performance.
Sean Penn's performance this is still certianly a very specific character. He uses an accent, as well as distinct way he stands and looks that suggests the upbringing as well as the past of his character. The reason they work in this film is because Penn is consist with them, and never puts an overt emphasis, rather simply having them there as part of the actual person that is Matthew Poncelet.
The other reason these mannerisms work in the performance is because he brings them in with a full characterization of the person, that is never just an an external attitude, but a person as a whole. Penn performance as Matthew Poncelet most certainly is careful and finely attuned but it still always remains natural, and his acting never becomes obvious as it does in some of his later performances.
Sean Penn's performance is quite interesting in how he shows the way Poncelet has almost developed himself into particular way from his life on death role. When the Sister Helen Prejean (Susan Sarandon) first comes to meet him, he attempts to act tougher than he really is. Penn is on the mark in creating a bit of a facade Matthew has, that he almost has to have, well still suggesting his actual more sensitive self.
I think something rather interesting that Penn does in this performance is the fact that he does not try to portray Poncelet as all that intelligent, but still not a simple man. Penn portrays his lack of intelligence actually in Poncelet's television interview where he makes several extreme remarks involving racism as well as terrorism.
Penn makes this seem as something Poncelet does not necessarily that he really at all believes it but rather he just again uses as some sort of attempt to show his anger over his condemnation. When questioned by the sister, Penn really shows just the complete lack of though Poncelet really has over the matter, Penn shows that Poncelet honestly is just not a smart man.
The most important part of his performance is of course Poncelet's whole relationship with the sister. Sarandon and Penn do wonders together, in creating the incredible unique relationship between the Nun and the death row inmate. It is fascinating because Sarandon portrays the sister always as warm, and loving, but still she pressures Matthew on his refusal to accept that he was at all guilty.
Penn though interestingly does not always show as much focus in the relationship until near the end, because Penn does a great job in showing that Matthew has a lot more on his mind all the time, and how his impending death, as well as his guilt is constantly eating away at him, making him more reluctant to try to always instantly accept the sister's method of try to save him.
Penn though eases in perfectly when they become more relaxed with one another, and begins to shed his facade of sorts, and really opens up to her, showing with Penn presenting Matthew's deep sadness and fear he deeply has inside himself. They eventually create a credible, very authentic relationship honestly based on very real platonic love for one another.
The most powerful moments of his performance are on his execution date. Every scene on his last day is made heartbreaking becuase through the entire ordeal Penn never strikes a single false note. From his last visit from his family, which is particularly effective because of how warm he is with his brother and his mother, as he tries to ignore the execution on his mind. To later nearer to it when he finally comes to grip completely with his situation and his guilt.
The final scenes are rather difficult to watch, because Penn really shows this being a human being killed, not some animal, but a man. A man with his honest fear of death, and finally his admittance of what he did. Penn never for a moment seems to be acting, he really becomes a man who is about to be killed, it is incredible as well as distressing to watch. This is simply a great performance by Penn that leaves an almost unforgettable impression.
Best Actor 1995
And the Nominees Were:
Sean Penn in Dead Man Walking
Anthony Hopkins in Nixon
Nicolas Cage in Leaving Las Vegas
Richard Dreyfuss in Mr. Holland's Opus
Massimo Troisi in The Postman
Sean Penn in Dead Man Walking
Anthony Hopkins in Nixon
Nicolas Cage in Leaving Las Vegas
Richard Dreyfuss in Mr. Holland's Opus
Massimo Troisi in The Postman
Labels:
1995,
Anthony Hopkins,
Best Actor,
Massimo Troisi,
Nicolas Cage,
Richard Dreyfuss,
Sean Penn
Best Actor 2008: Results
5. Brad Pitt in The Curious Case of Benjamin Button- Pitt's performance is a dull lifeless effort that does nothing to bring to life the strange premise of his character.
4. Sean Penn in Milk-Penn performance is always very actory, and always very hard to believe to me because of that. He never realizes a true character to me instead just a series of external mannerisms.
3. Frank Langella in Frost/Nixon-Like Penn Langella as well fails to really realize his character in any true fashion, and as well focuses far too much on his mannerisms, that are incorrect to Nixon anyway, which amount to a rather ineffective characterization.
2. Richard Jenkins in The Visitor- The only person who should have been nominated, but not win is Jenkins. It is not a big performance, or an amazing achievement, but Jenkins is most certainly very good in his portrait of a man who slowly finds some joy, and passion in his life.
1. Mickey Rourke in The Wrestler- Good prediction Dinasztie. This is one of my easiest choices very really, because Rourke is the only possibly choice for this year and this category. He stands far above the rest, in his deeply moving portrait of Randy The Ram Robinson. Rourke shows so much to his character both the positive and the negative, never playing a single moment falsely, despite taking many risks with his performance.
Deserving Performances:
Leonardo DiCaprio in Revolutionary Road
Brendan Gleeson in In Bruges
David Kross in The Reader
4. Sean Penn in Milk-Penn performance is always very actory, and always very hard to believe to me because of that. He never realizes a true character to me instead just a series of external mannerisms.
3. Frank Langella in Frost/Nixon-Like Penn Langella as well fails to really realize his character in any true fashion, and as well focuses far too much on his mannerisms, that are incorrect to Nixon anyway, which amount to a rather ineffective characterization.
2. Richard Jenkins in The Visitor- The only person who should have been nominated, but not win is Jenkins. It is not a big performance, or an amazing achievement, but Jenkins is most certainly very good in his portrait of a man who slowly finds some joy, and passion in his life.
1. Mickey Rourke in The Wrestler- Good prediction Dinasztie. This is one of my easiest choices very really, because Rourke is the only possibly choice for this year and this category. He stands far above the rest, in his deeply moving portrait of Randy The Ram Robinson. Rourke shows so much to his character both the positive and the negative, never playing a single moment falsely, despite taking many risks with his performance.
Deserving Performances:
Leonardo DiCaprio in Revolutionary Road
Brendan Gleeson in In Bruges
David Kross in The Reader
Best Actor 2008: Sean Penn in Milk
Sean Penn won his second Oscar from his fourth nomination for portraying Harvey Milk in Milk.
Milk is a rather standard biography film, that basically is just a retelling of the documentary about Harvey Milk, making its original screenplay win pretty hard to understand.
I think the best way actually to criticize this performance is to examine much of its praise which it heavily received in 2008. Well it was constantly praised as a technical performance. Look at the way he holds his arms back in enthusiasm was one, the way he walked was another. Well I must say that actually detracted greatly from the performance in my view. Penn lack in Mystic River, but to an even fuller extent always seems to be far to self-aware of his performance.
I know some might say, hey but aren't you that guy who think Laurence Olivier is one greatest actors ever, he most certianly was an actor who knew the in and out of his performance, well in his best performances he never let the audience knew he knew, and brought it about naturally. Sean Penn on the other hand never seems to not let the audience know that he most certianly is acting in this performance.
Penn I never felt really attempted at much to show a greater inner depth of character, but rather like Langella in my view always played each scene as just an acting display. Sure he most certianly has his quiet scenes as Langella did, but like them they seemed much too tailored merely to be the quiet scenes, rather than more natural scenes to show the range of the character.
I was never very convinced by Penn portrayal of Milk becuase of this, and I always felt it to be a very on the surface performance, always caught up on making far too obvious of faces, and gestures in both his quiet and loud scenes. I also thought his portrayal really tried to focus on the flamboyant aspects of Milk, just to simply go hey look I'm Sean Penn playing Harvey Milk, isn't this performance completely different from my other performances.
Due to this fact I always felt he played Milk in a rather stereotypical fashion, that always seemed rather awkward and unnatural to me. Milk's relationship with James Franco's character, never seemed believable because frankly both actors in all of those scenes seemed too aware that they were playing homosexual characters, and they themselves were not.
Sean Penn's performance as Milk never goes beyond his external obvious acting in my book. I think this is partially to blame the film as well, which perhaps also looks as Milk as a fairly surface documentary subject, rather than trying to completely get into the real depth of the character. Well perhaps the film believed Penn would do that, well for me though he never did that in the least.
Milk is a rather standard biography film, that basically is just a retelling of the documentary about Harvey Milk, making its original screenplay win pretty hard to understand.
I think the best way actually to criticize this performance is to examine much of its praise which it heavily received in 2008. Well it was constantly praised as a technical performance. Look at the way he holds his arms back in enthusiasm was one, the way he walked was another. Well I must say that actually detracted greatly from the performance in my view. Penn lack in Mystic River, but to an even fuller extent always seems to be far to self-aware of his performance.
I know some might say, hey but aren't you that guy who think Laurence Olivier is one greatest actors ever, he most certianly was an actor who knew the in and out of his performance, well in his best performances he never let the audience knew he knew, and brought it about naturally. Sean Penn on the other hand never seems to not let the audience know that he most certianly is acting in this performance.
Penn I never felt really attempted at much to show a greater inner depth of character, but rather like Langella in my view always played each scene as just an acting display. Sure he most certianly has his quiet scenes as Langella did, but like them they seemed much too tailored merely to be the quiet scenes, rather than more natural scenes to show the range of the character.
I was never very convinced by Penn portrayal of Milk becuase of this, and I always felt it to be a very on the surface performance, always caught up on making far too obvious of faces, and gestures in both his quiet and loud scenes. I also thought his portrayal really tried to focus on the flamboyant aspects of Milk, just to simply go hey look I'm Sean Penn playing Harvey Milk, isn't this performance completely different from my other performances.
Due to this fact I always felt he played Milk in a rather stereotypical fashion, that always seemed rather awkward and unnatural to me. Milk's relationship with James Franco's character, never seemed believable because frankly both actors in all of those scenes seemed too aware that they were playing homosexual characters, and they themselves were not.
Sean Penn's performance as Milk never goes beyond his external obvious acting in my book. I think this is partially to blame the film as well, which perhaps also looks as Milk as a fairly surface documentary subject, rather than trying to completely get into the real depth of the character. Well perhaps the film believed Penn would do that, well for me though he never did that in the least.
Best Actor 2008
And the Nominees Were:
Frank Langella in Frost/Nixon
Brad Pitt in The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Sean Penn in Milk
Richard Jenkins in The Visitor
Mickey Rourke in The Wrestler
Frank Langella in Frost/Nixon
Brad Pitt in The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Sean Penn in Milk
Richard Jenkins in The Visitor
Mickey Rourke in The Wrestler
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














